Discussion

The free LocalStackreplacement

kay_o: > Copyright (c) 2024 MiniStack ContributorsAlready lying or totally unreviewed AI slop ?

giobox: Ugh, I hadn't heard the news about the LocalStack changes. I had some great results building AWS services for local dev as well as CI/CD and testing in GH actions with LocalStack in previous jobs.I secretly always hoped Amazon would buy out LocalStack and make it the official free local development environment for AWS work, but I guess it probably would reduce revenues spent on AWS based dev and test environments.

mikecarlton: Another alternative, earlier on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47420619

staticassertion: I really don't see how any clone is going to manage to do what localstack couldn't - maintain compatibility with tons of AWS services while not getting paid for it. If this were viable, why would it not have worked before?The only things I can think of are that perhaps LocalStack was just a mess of a codebase that couldn't maintain velocity or attract contributors, or it just failed to steward new contributors or some such thing.

cmertayak: I liked the transparency: "Built entirely with AI by Jack Danger | All prompts saved in prompts/"

nnucera: Hey yeah sorry I copied from an old repo I had... I'll update it in the next iteration

4m1rk: I suppose (among many other things) LLMs are changing this. We no longer need that many contributors when we can use AWS docs, intercept AWS API calls and give it to AI agent to mimic. Of course, contributors are still needed for maintaining tests and validations.

switchbak: "LocalStack was just a mess of a codebase" - very true.I do think there's potential to semi-automatically create a compatible suite of services, but it'll require some very talented use of LLMs and some novel testing approaches. Not something I want to sign up for.I evaluated Floci, but that has the typical issues you'd expected with freshly minted vibe code.