Discussion

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

rsolva: Nifty, looks like the enterprise edition of OpenClaw, kinda. Also, it looks token hungry!

Johnny_Bonk: Interesting, what are the benefits and drawbacks you've found developing and using it yourself?

wpasc: I see some tools like this that keep popping up (don't mean that in a bad way! it's clearly exciting and the README itself compares itself to similar tools). however, for coordination strategies like this, aren't you always having to use token-based pricing via some API Key? that's the largest think that holds me personally back from getting into something like these frameworks. With a claude code max plan, all my delegation and coordination has to be done within a session (between some agents) with persisted artifacts. Unless I'm missing something that has changed?Perhaps it's all moot as the usage you get from a subscription plan will eventually no longer be subsidized. Also, I have to wonder about what layers of coordination done externally to a model can be persistently better than within tool coordination? Like, with an anthropic feature like agent teams, I feel like it might be tough to beat anthropic native coordination of various Claude sessions because they might have better internal tool and standards awareness, which makes feeling like plugging something like this more difficult unless one's goal is to plug something like this into an open source model.Geniunely curious how other people are thinking about this!!Edit: I actually see that this tool claims that it can run within your existing Claude Code subscription, so now I'm extra interested.

Matticus_Rex: But does it work? and well?

_pdp_: It doesn't.

skanga: What did you try? What did it do?

robotburrito: Your know the answer to this question haha.