Discussion
Professional video editing, right in your browser
bensyverson: Really cool! It may not replace a dedicated NLE for professional editors, but I love that it's a fully functional NLE that you could drop into an existing web app that handles video.
thefourthchime: This is very cool!! but a test video I did and I played it back on Safari, the video playback was very, very choppy (m2 air). Is this a known issue?
mohebifar: Ah I believe I should have clarified browser support. Safari is not very well supported. Have you tried chrome?
xrd: I've been using kdenlive and it is functional as an open source video editor. I don't know if kdenlive supports shared assets and projects, but this feels like something this project could offer and exceed expectations. Is that on the roadmap?
Jaxkr: Great project. The last time someone did this idea well they got acquired by Microsoft. Clipchamp has since been enshittified, making them ripe for disruption. The wheel continues to turn…
SlavikCA: Great project!Is there similar project for image editing?Just basic features:- cropping- rotating- brightness & contrast
fragmede: photopea?
bstsb: looking good! getting red/inverted video flashes on Firefox, M4 Pro. could be an issue with canvas anti-fingerprinting though, not sure its root cause
Jayakumark: great project but non commercial license, makes me not to go near it.
mohebifar: I see. I haven't decided on the commercial license yet. This might be temporary. I started this as part of another for-profit side project (for dubbing videos with AI). I may change the license later as the quote unquote "copyright owner". If I see the open-source community is active and finds it useful, I'd switch to a free-er license. Things are not super clear yet to me re what can be done with a web based video editor.
mohebifar: Free and open source NLE video editor powered by WGPU, WASM, WebGPU, Rust, and Tanstack Start
esafak: Any plugin plans? Would you like to share your development experience?
skyberrys: This looks cool! I'll check it out later from my computer, I'm guessing it's not so easy to use on mobile.
tredre3: I personally don't see a problem with having the code be for non-commercial use only, but your hosted instance probably should allow commercial use. Otherwise I don't see how you're going to become the Photopea of video, which you stated as a goal.
mohebifar: Great question! I actually have built a poc that is not released yet. It's on the roadmap. It requires some tooling for the devs building these plugins like a CLI for building the WASM binaries, bundling, manifests, etc.The current poc still has significant performance overhead, and that overhead grows as the plugin system becomes more powerful. If plugins are only allowed to apply a WGSL shader, the performance impact is almost negligible. But features that require broader access to timeline data, such as time shifts, speed ramps, or full timeline transformations, become much more expensive and make zero-copy architectures harder to reason about.
modeless: Yeah, Photopea isn't exactly basic but it's great. If this became the Photopea equivalent for video that would be awesome.
esafak: In case you don't know, there is a standard for it: https://openeffects.org/I suggest creating a CONTRIBUTING.md and enabling discussions if you are open to PRs.
RobotToaster: This is absolutely not an open source license https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0/It violates point 1,5 and 6 of the open source definition https://opensource.org/osd
empressplay: I think you selected the wrong license. Your license currently as written actually forbids _using_ the software for a commercial purpose, eg if someone monetizes a video edited using your software, they are in violation of your license, which is not what you want.Look at something like the Hashicorp BSL [1] for inspiration on crafting a license that forbids specific commercialization of the software itself.[1] https://www.hashicorp.com/en/bsl
Retr0id: Tried it in Firefox and it was working for a few minutes and then managed to crash the whole browser. Definitely a firefox and/or gpu driver bug though. I can't wait for WebGPU browser/platform support to get a bit more mature, because it's awesome (although the security implications do make me nervous).
cpb: +1 for seeking clarity on commercial use.I want to support some colleagues with automating some of the setup of routine video editing. Can't consider this impressive work without that clarity!
bitwize: Is it feature-parity with Adobe Premiere and Final Cut Pro? If not, then it's not professional.
xnx: How does this compare to https://omniclip.app/ ?
