Discussion

The Palantir's Stasi Protocols

pawsocks: The 'manifesto' reads very much like it was written by someone who is on Twitter way too much, and considers quote tweets to be public harrassment.

mcmcmc: [delayed]

shevy-java: So is this AI generated? My assumption was yes so I skipped it. Either way I think this actually makes it harder to analyse Palantir's wrongdoings any any potential flow of money into lobbyists. Having a flashy website isn't a substitute for real analysis.I miss the 1990s a bit; there used to be elderly folks who did not know much about HTML/CSS, but they were real, no AI autogenerating slop there. I can't even tell what is real and what is AI slop anymore.

rexpop: Why would you assume so? The author is critiquing notorious AI maximalist.FWIW, their are typoes in it, too.

esafak: Crank is the word that comes to mind. Living in his own mind. I did not read too carefully because my first impression was negative.

wyldberry: Maybe some people should use AI tools to proofread their work for content and tone before publishing.

gowld: I'm not edgy and cool enough to understand this website.

qwerpy: All of the poster’s previous attempts had been flagged to death but this one apparently aligns better with the prevailing sentiment.

Prof_Sigmund: Those flags were strangely funny to me. We posted our open source privacy tool. A flag. We posted a "Forensic analysis of the RLHF supply chain: The $2/HR labor behind AI alignment." A flag. :) Even our "In Memoriam: Jason Snitker, a.k.a. Parmaster. RIP Legend" was flagged!? Etc.

billyhoffman: Sincere advice: Consider engaging with a community before trying to use it to promote your work.You account is not even 3 months old. In that time you made 6 submissions, all of them appears to be to your own work. You have only commented 9 times, with almost all of them being comments about your work.