Discussion

RapidPhoto - Batch Crop & Edit

xnx: Sounds like a great use case for a free tool like Gemini CLI. (e.g. "Adjust all the photos in this folder..."). Gemini CLI is smart enough to use ImageMagick or python to apply those changes.

asibahi: How does the application apply the same lighting setting to all photos if applying the same lighting settings in Lightroom is not suitable for all images? What magic is being done here?(and what advantage does it have over using `magick`?)

mzajc: > It runs locally on your Mac with no uploads and there is no subscription.From the bottom of the description on apps.apple.com: SUBSCRIPTION • Free tier: 10 images, common ratios, JPEG & PNG export • Premium: Unlock all 500 images, 9 formats, 15 ratios, and pro tools • Plans: Weekly ($2.99) · Monthly ($6.99) · Yearly ($39.99)

cgomez: Batch photo editors already exist, like the long standing and superb Retrobatch. It’s $30-50 as a one time purchase.https://flyingmeat.com/retrobatch/Also, oddly, this post highlights “no subscription” about their project but the App Store page shows several subscriptions and that the app actually costs $40 a year?

0x6c6f6c: This is likely one of the many pains of App Store subscription configuration issues. Once anyone has subscribed you will have to migrate those yourself and even those details I'm not sure what restrictions there are. The latest seems to be one-time purchase, but historical cleanup is probably necessary on their part

om202: yeah Retrobatch is solid, I have seen iton pricing, that is fair callout, older versions had subscription and App Store listing might still show that depending on update or region I recently moved it to one time purchase because it makes more sense for this kind of toolstill figuring things out as I go

rajptech: The best tools come from scratching your own itch. 2000 photos is exactly the kind of pain point that no existing tool solves well enough because the big players optimize for the casual user, not the power user with a specific workflow. I built a CLI tool for the same reason — existing solutions didn't work the way I needed them to. Curious: are you planning to ship this or keep it as a personal tool?

om202: yeah earlier versions had subscription, I was experimenting with pricing but I did not like it either, especially for something like thislatest version is one time purchase nowtrying to keep it simple and local, no uploads and no ongoing fees

lillesvin: If you're not afraid of working in a CLI, ImageMagick is also a very solid tool for editing lots and lots of images in bulk as long as you know what you want done to them.

om202: yeah ImageMagick is solid, especially when the edits are very consistentI think where I struggled was when the set is mostly similar but still needs small per photo tweaks writing new commands or rerunning pipeline for small changes felt a bit heavyI wanted something more interactive where I can adjust visually, apply to many, then still tweak few without starting over

sublinear: > the big players optimize for the casual useThis is the OG enshittification.Software quality is declining because people don't have the same problems anymore. They've become so detached from their true desires and learned to cope with their walled garden ecosystems. If their iPhone doesn't do it they just pretend it's not possible.

om202: yeah exactly, it started as just solving my own workflowI am shipping it now, but still treating it like a tool I use myself first and improving it based on real usenot trying to compete with big tools, more like filling that gap when you have a specific workflow that does not fit well anywhere

foundermodus: Wow, that's so cool man. Gotta try this out. Thanks :))

rajptech: That's the right approach. Building from real use keeps you honest about what actually matters vs what sounds cool in a feature list. Good luck with the launch.

om202: Thank you. Please let me know if it solves your problem and is useful to you!

inovica: I'd suggest adjusting your text. Sure there is no subscription, but it's also not free. There's a one-time charge. I'm not against that - just saying it would be appropriate to be more transparent

Rekindle8090: You are replying to an LLM, not a person.