Discussion
warmcat: Good work. But what makes this different than just another feature in Gemini Code assist or Github copilot?
solfox: Not a direct competitor but another YC company I use and enjoy for PR reviews is cubic.dev. I like your focus on automated tests.
blintz: I really want automated QA to work better! It's a great thing to work on.Some feedback:- I definitely don't want three long new messages on every PR. Max 1, ideally none? Codex does a great job just using emoji.- The replay is cool. I don't make a website, so maybe I'm not the target market, but I'd like QA for our backend.- Honestly, I'd rather just run a massive QA run every day, and then have any failures bisected, rather than per-PR.- I am worried that there's not a lot of value beyond the intelligence of the foundation models here.
Bnjoroge: Agree on your last point and it's going to be a very bitter lesson. In any case, you probably wanna shift alot of the code verification as left as possible so doing review at PR time isnt the right strat imo. And claude/codex are well positioned to do the local review.
Bnjoroge: what kinds of tests does it generate and how's this different from the tens of code review startups out there?
